Ear Nose Throat & Head - Neck diseases

Welcome to World of Ear Nose & Throat Diseases & Head-Neck Surgery

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Fw: Faculty of 1000: your article has been evaluated

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Faculty of 1000 Medicine <editorial@f1000.com>
To: drmubarakkhan@yahoo.co.in
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2011 4:54 PM
Subject: Faculty of 1000: your article has been evaluated

Dear MM Khan,

I'm pleased to inform you that one of your articles, Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. (Am J Otolaryngol 2011 Sep-Oct), has been selected and evaluated by Neil Bailie, a Member of the Faculty of 1000 (F1000), which places your work in our library of the top 2% of published articles in biology and medicine. The service is widely used to find significant new research articles, and the inclusion of your article should significantly increase its visibility.
   
The evaluation of your article is appended below. If your institution is a subscriber to F1000, you may view this and any further evaluations at http://f1000.com/13330956. Otherwise, we're happy to offer you a complimentary subscription to F1000 for a period of 3 months - please email our team at info@f1000.com. You can also recommend an institutional trial or subscription to your librarian using our online forms at http://f1000.com/request/subscription/main.

The current Article Factor is displayed next to your article. If your article is further evaluated by the Faculty, this factor will increase, taking your article higher up the rankings for this subject.

Our new community features enable a discussion to be built around your publication. Additional Faculty Members in our 300+ Sections may evaluate and rate your article, and subscribers can post comments; you'll be notified when this occurs. We hope you'll join the conversation, providing follow-up notes concerning your article and responding to ideas put forth by commenters and evaluators. There is a checkbox in the comment section that can be selected to identify you as an author of the article.

As a post-publication peer review service, we embrace the idea that the impact of your article can deepen and spread in unforeseen ways with community interaction. Even your own reckoning of the article may advance toward further conclusions, and result in new strategies and collaborations.

To find out more about F1000, including our magazine, which features commentaries, author Q&As, debates, and our review journal, which provides insight into emerging concepts, visit our site at http://f1000.com.

And congratulations on your success!

With best wishes

Sarah Greene
Editor-in-Chief
Faculty of 1000
editorial@f1000.com


Article details:

Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results.
MM Khan, SR Parab
Am J Otolaryngol 2011 Sep-Oct 32 5:381-7
PMID 20832904 DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.07.010



Evaluation details:


Recommended [6]

Important Confirmation

Sections:

Otology/Vestibular/Audiology

Comments:
I found that this article proves the success of an already well-established technique of cartilage tympanoplasty and its wider applications in type I tympanoplasties. The abstract is well structured. The methodology is acceptable; however, it would have been better if the study had been conducted prospectively. The desirable acoustic properties and high graft uptake rates of sliced/thinned cartilage graft are well established in the literature and this article confirms this. The authors have clearly and elaborately described the technique of graft harvesting and positioning. The follow-up of at least 2 years with audiogram establishes the long-term continued success rate of the procedure. However, the authors failed to describe in detail the size of the perforation, any revision procedures or any contralateral or bilateral ear surgeries, which in my opinion are important factors in deciding on the long-term graft uptake rates. A significant number of patients (45 out of 268) missed the follow-up but neither they were included in the final results nor the authors explained the reason for exclusion. The statistical analysis used was very simple. The cartilage splitter set (Kalelkar Surgical, Mumbai, India) is described in an article of similar type and is available in the international market from Medtronic (The MicroFrance® Teixido Cartilage Cutter). Its interesting to see the huge variations in practice in different parts of the globe. In the UK, with free health care and limited resources (National Health Service), weekly (for 4 weeks) and monthly (for 6 months) follow-up is impossible and not necessary. The role of postoperative antibiotics in routine middle ear operations is controversial.





No comments: